Table 1

Levels of evidence for treatment and prevention of postamputation pain6 13 46 48 59 61 102

Type of postamputation painLevel ILevel IILevel IIILevel IVNegative
Treatment of phantom limb pain(None)
  • Gabapentin

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (short-term benefit)

  • Tricyclic antidepressants

  • NMDA receptor antagonists (ketamine and dextromethorphan) for short-term benefit

  • Peripheral nerve stimulation

  • Prolonged local anesthetic infusion

  • Targeted muscle reinnervation surgery

  • Opioids

  • Calcitonin

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (short-term benefit)

  • Mirror therapy and virtual reality (short-term benefit)

  • Regenerative peripheral nerve interface surgery

  • Neurolysis of painful neuroma

  • Intravenous lidocaine

  • Botulinum toxin

  • Sympathetic blocks (provide only immediate-term relief)

Treatment of residual limb pain(None)
  • Intravenous lidocaine (immediate-term benefit)

  • Prolonged local anesthetic infusion

  • Targeted muscle reinnervation surgery

  • Regenerative peripheral nerve interface surgery

  • Neurolysis of painful neuroma

  • Botulinum toxin

  • Sympathetic blocks (provide only immediate-term relief)

Prevention of postamputation pain(None)
  • Targeted muscle reinnervation surgery

  • Patient-controlled opioid analgesia

  • Epidural anesthesia placed >24 hours before surgery (including with calcitonin)

  • Catheter-based regional anesthesia

  • Regenerative peripheral nerve interface surgery

  • Ketamine infusion

  • Gabapentin

  • Stump wrapping/limb cover (eg, aluminum foil)

  • Levels of evidence based on modified Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence criteria.6 103 I=systematic review of randomized trials or n-of-1 trials, II=randomized trial(s) or observational study(ies) with dramatic effect, III=non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study(ies), IV=case-series, case–control studies, or historically controlled studies. Note that levels may be downgraded on the basis of study quality, imprecision, indirectness, inconsistency between studies, or small absolute effect sizes.