Table 2

Quality of evidence examined through the GRADE criteria for each estimate.

Prognostic factor (studies (n))LimitationsInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionPublication biasPooled risk factor (95% CI)Patients (n)GRADE assessment
Child general anxiety (n=3)Some limitationsLow heterogeneity (I2=0%)No serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionUndetectedOR=0.004 (95% CI −0.02, 0.03)604Moderate
Child pain-related anxiety (n=4)Some limitationsHigh heterogeneity (I2=2.85%)No serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionUndetectedOR=−0.006 (95% CI −0.03, 0.02)664Moderate
Child pain intensity (n=4)No serious limitationsModerate significant heterogeneity (I2=58.62%)No serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionUndetectedOR=0.540 (95% CI 0.184, 0.894)614Moderate
Parent pain catastrophizing (n=3)No serious limitationsStatistical Significance of high heterogeneity (I2=77.28%)No serious indirectnessSome imprecisionUndetectedOR=0.014 (95% CI −0.07, 0.01)399Moderate
  • GRADE, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.